Showing posts with label information. Show all posts
Showing posts with label information. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Burrowing US prairie dogs use complex language

A tiny rodent may have the most sophisticated language of any animal.
This bold claim comes from US-based academic Professor Con Slobodchikoff who has long studied the vocal repertoire of Gunnison's prairie dog.
With a single bark, he says, a prairie dog may warn about the type and direction of an encroaching predator, and even describe its colour.
If confirmed, that means the chattering rodents communicate in a more complex way than even monkeys or dolphins.
Prof Slobodchikoff details the experiments he has done to reveal the hidden structure of the prairie dog's language within the BBC natural history programme "Prairie dogs, talk of the town," broadcast as part of the Natural World documentary series.
Prairie dogs belong to the squirrel family, and live in the prairies and semi-desert grassland of northern Arizona, northern New Mexico and southwest Colorado.
Once existing in their billions, prairie dog numbers have now plummeted as ranchers view them as vermin competing for resources with livestock.
But those remaining still live in huge colonies of hundreds of animals, digging complex underground burrow systems.
Whenever a predator approaches, the small rodents let out a series of barks, squeals and squeaks.
For 30 years, Prof Slobodchikoff and colleagues have been recording these calls.
To analyse them, the scientists set up a series of experiments, dragging models of different predators in front of wary prairie dogs, recording if they respond differently to coyotes, hawks and badgers.
Predatory playback
The researchers found that the prairie dogs are confronted by so many predators that they have evolved different "words" to describe them all.
These words are barks and sounds that contain different numbers of rhythmic chirps and frequency modulations.
Individual prairie dogs have different tonal qualities, just as human voices differ, but different rodents use the same words to describe the same predators, allowing the alarm call to be understood by the rest of the colony.
For example, a single bark may be attuned to say "tall, skinny coyote in distance, moving rapidly towards colony".
Other scientists have challenged this idea, because it would mean that in one short bark, prairie dogs relay information about the size, colour, direction and speed of travel of an encroaching predator.
Prof Slobodchikoff's team believes the prairie dogs include this information by varying the modulation of the call and the harmonics in the bark.
By doing so, they can pack in a vast amount of information into a very short sound.


"Prairie dogs have the most complex natural language that has been decoded so far. They have words for different predators, they have descriptive words for describing the individual features of different predators, so it's a pretty complex language that has a lot of elements," says Prof Slobodchikoff.
In the documentary, the scientists record for the first time the prairie dogs' call to warn about badgers.
It is subtly but consistently different to all the other calls.
When the alarm call is played back to a colony of rodents they react differently to when they are played a call warning of coyotes.
Coyotes hunt by surprise so the rodents respond by instantly bolting. Badgers try to dig into burrows, and when the prairie dogs are warned of a badger they become instantly vigilant instead.
Prof Slobodchikoff believes the prairie dogs may have evolved such complex language because they live in a complex, social society housed in a highly engineered and complex burrow system.
Not only do they live in highly organised "towns" of hundreds of individuals, but they also have to compete with squatters, such as cottontail rabbits, rattlesnakes, tarantulas, burrowing owls, badgers and swift foxes, that often move into their burrows.

Monday, February 1, 2010

WikiLeaks whistleblower site in temporary shutdown

WikiLeaks, a whistleblower website that allows people to publish uncensored information anonymously, has suspended operations owing to financial problems.
Its running costs including staff payments are $600,000 (£377,000), but so far this year it has raised just $130,000 (£81,000).
WikiLeaks has established a reputation for publishing information that traditional media cannot.
The website claims to be non-profit and relies on donations.
A statement on its front page says it is funded by "human rights campaigners, investigative journalists, technologists and the general public".
Original documents
WikiLeaks does not accept money from governments or corporations.
A list of names and addresses of people said to belong to the British National Party (BNP) was posted on the site in October 2009.
WikiLeaks also published e-mail exchanges involving US politician Sarah Palin after her account was hacked.
The site claims to have information about corrupt banks, the UN and the Iraq war that it is unable to publish while funds remain low.
While it has won awards for its work from the Economist and Amnesty International, WikiLeaks has also fought more than 100 legal challenges.
"WikiLeaks has established a good name for itself and broken some good stories," Julian Petley, chair of the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom, told BBC News.
"One of the reasons why WikiLeaks is so useful is that it's able to put original documents up - unfiltered by comment and editorial."
Investigative journalist Paul Lashmar said he had been "startled" by the effectiveness of WikiLeaks in publishing suppressed information.
However he thought that the funding issue would not be easily resolved.
"(Web) users aren't interested in how the people behind sites make their money," he said.
"The problem for the self-funding model is that sites like WikiLeaks will not find it easy to attract funding through advertising.
"At some point people who care about free speech will realise that free speech has to be funded, otherwise it's not free."